No party has a real plan to eliminate seniors’ poverty – but we do! We can meet this goal by bringing Old Age Security into the 21st century.

Leading parties are promising to cut taxes AND increase spending. We break down this magical thinking.

A promise to build more homes looks good on paper – but parties offer little evidence that they can meet these ambitious goals.

Should public land be sold off to private developers? We break down what leading parties are proposing.

By 2028, Ottawa will add $71B for Old Age security and $5B for post-secondary. No party is talking about whether this is the right balance.

Families are being squeezed by rising costs, but child care funding is being crowded out.

Young people endure high housing costs so the wealth gains of homeowners who came before them are protected. No party is talking about the compensation they deserve.

OAS is the largest and fastest growing cost in the federal budget. No party can fix the deficit without addressing its outdated design.

Do parties want home prices to rise, stall or fall? No party has a clear target to guide all housing investments.

Old Age Security gives $18k to retired couples with $180k household incomes. No party is planning to fix this inefficient spending.

Decades of housing policy has protected homeowner wealth gains by tolerating rising rents and prices. Why aren't parties proposing solutions?

No party can fix housing without compensating Millennials and Gen Z for the intergenerational solidarity they are offering by propping up high home prices.

We dive into party promises on housing, pollution pricing, tax cuts, and balancing the budget through the lens of generational fairness.

We dig into Conservative, Liberal and NDP promises (or lack thereof) on medical care, retirement spending, tax cuts, housing, postsecondary, child care, and deficits.